Biography Diana dollars

Diana: The reverse side of the myth. Its popularity and tragic death led to the emergence of a huge number of myths, so many have forgotten about what it was in life during her lifetime, and many simply do not know about the article on the place of work, BBC, London on August 31, August 31, a young woman fell into a car accident in the Paris tunnel under the Alma bridge.

A few hours later, already in the hospital, she died. In the girlishness, her name was Lady Diana Spencer, in marriage - her royal Highness Princess of Wales, after the divorce - Diana, Princess of Wales, after death - the people's princess. Many of the past celebrities are remembered much less often and forget much faster - as a rule, simply because they experience their glory.

However, interest in Diana does not fall. The author of the photo, Jack Taylor Signature for the photo, the first flowers at the gate of the Kensington Palace, in which Diana lived, appeared on her death day on August 31. Then there were so many of them that it was impossible to come closer to the gate than her meters of her life turned into a myth in which the vicissitudes of wealth, glory, beauty and worship were weaved.

True Diana, a woman with pleasant and not very character traits that each of us has, irrevocably dissolved in a legend created by public consciousness. However, the truth is no less interesting, because it makes it possible to look at the back of a glossy picture and make sure that life is much more multifaceted than a beautiful and sad fairy tale. But if Charles was no longer Prince Wales, then Diana would not be so used to calling Diana to Princess Diana that no one thinks about how much such an appeal is true.

This is the case when the amount changes from the rearrangement of terms. The daughter of Queen Elizabeth II is Princess Anna. Diana, while being married, was called Diana, Princess of Wales. Kate Middleton, marrying Prince William, became a duchess. After her husband receives the title of Prince of Wales, she will be called Katherine, Princess of Wales, but not Princess Katherine.

Does this matter? In fact, not the slightest, but this is the first discrepancy between reality in a rather long list. The newlyweds stand on the steps of the Westminster Abbey, in which "simple" people do not get married do not think that Prince Charles married a "simple" girl. Unfortunately, for all participants in this story, he belonged to the last generation of members of the royal family, for whom the origin and status of the future wife were important.

The potential princess was supposed to belong to the aristocracy and, as said, "not to have the past," that is, no previous ties with men. Lady Diana Spencer met both requirements. In addition, royal blood flowed in her veins, although not always obtained in a legal marriage. The author of the photo, Hulton Archive signature for the photo, the future princess on his first birthday. The photograph was taken in a house located not somewhere, but on the territory of the Royal estimate in Norfolka.

Spencer and Windsors lived next door to the first Count Spencer, John, received his title of the year. His daughter, Lady Jorgian Spencer, married the Duke of Devonshire If you watched the film "Duchess" with Kira Knightley, then he is about her. Diana was also related to Winston Churchill and with the loving king Charles II, since among her ancestors there are two of his illegal son: Henry Fitzra and Charles Lennox.

Therefore, one of her ancestors was the great -grandmother of Karl - Maria Stuart. Diana was buried on the territory of this estate, her brother was the godson of the current queen, and her grandmother was one of the maids of the queen Mary, the wife of George V. Therefore, the assertion that did not suspect Diana, decorating with flowers and jewelry, led to the altar as Aries on the Strengthen, did not quite correspond to reality: she knew perfectly what the royal family was.

In other words, we can say that Diana was an insider, who successfully pretended to an outsider, in which the press actively helped her. Diana was not shy that distinguished her from the rest of the royal family, the author of the photo, the Central Press signature to the photo, the “simple and shy” girl was neither the popular point of view that Diana was completely not torn to the forefront of the Sofites, but reluctantly recognized the need for public as part of her duties.

But this was not from shyness, but because she all the time remembered her high growth of five feet and 10 inches. She lowered her head so that it would be more convenient for people to talk to her. ”The author of the photo, Bettmann signature to the photo, Diana and Charles at the opening of an exhibition dedicated to Lord Mountbeten, killed by the Irish extremes of the prince Charles, Prince of Philip.In addition, Diana and Charles were almost one height of Diana’s brother, Count Spencer, also claimed that she was “not shy, but she was on her mind and always at first behaved with new people very restrained ...

She appreciated the interlocutor before reacting to his words. It was generally not shyness, but ingenuity.” Diana was not a sincere and honest author of the photo, Tim Graham Photo Library Signature to the photo, Diana during an interview with Martin Bashir, after which Queen Elizabeth II said that Diana and Charles would be better to divorce the frankness with which Diana spoke about her marital infidelity, the fight against bulimia and attempts at suicide, created around her around her A halo of sincerity and truthfulness.

The princess, the journalist and the BBC: how Martin Bashir took the sensational interview from Princess Diana in reality she had several ambivalent relations. In Panegirik at her funeral, Count Spencer said that "the world cherished her vulnerability, admiring her honesty." But a few years earlier, he noticed that his sister "was true with great difficulty, because she liked to embellish her stories." We can say that the book about Diana brought him glory and money twice: the first time - when she first went out of the press, the second - when he included the decoding of the films in the second edition, on the basis of which the first option was written and much more specific examples.

In the year, Diana gave an interview to the host of the BBC program “Panorama” to Martin Bashir now we know that he has achieved her consent to the conversation not in a very correct way, but this does not change the essence. Here is a small excerpt from his transcription: Bashir: the Queen called the year "terrible." Have you ever met Andrew Morton, or did you personally help him in writing?

Diana: I have never met him. Bashir: But did you personally help him in writing his book? Diana: Many saw what suffering my life was filled with, and they considered that they would support me if they helped. The author of the photo, Bruce Glikas signature for the photo, is not Princess Diana, but actress Gina de Waal in the role of Diana in the musical about her life, set on Broadway after her death, it became known that she really did not meet with Morton, she handed him many films on which she recorded his book to an instant bestseller.

In the second, processed publication, Morton openly admitted that she was the main source of information for his book, and published the following story: “The writer and TV presenter Klave James told me how to once after Lanch he asked Diana if she helped this book. And at least once she directly lied to him:“ I really have nothing to do with the book of Andrew Morton, ” - said At the same time, she looked directly into his eyes, so he saw with her own eyes with what convincing she could lie.

” The first edition of Morton’s book went out of the press less than another year, another friend of Diana, Peter Palamba shared his similar experience: “I asked her whether it really happened or this, and in response she gave out a pure lies that I believed. But I was not offended, in the end, that was her nature and her character.” Prince Charles did not like his first wife, the author of the photo, Fox Photos signature to the photo, it is possible that some of us, if not most of the difference between these two photographs, seem symptomatic, did Prince Charles love, or did his heart belonged to Camille all their violent and far from happy family life?

Did Diana Charles love, or was she naively "led" to the sparkle of royal regalia? As the Americans say, these are a million dollars. There are no answers to them and cannot be, if only because one of the parties has long been not with us, and the other - by virtue of the nature and education received, will not spread about his personal life. If you believe the creators of the documentary of the British television channel ITV “Interview of Diana: Printer of the Princess”, made by the well of that very conversation with Martin Bashir, then there was no love.

But her sister seemed to her that “too late: your face is already on every kitchen towel” in him an astrologer, Princess Penny Thornton, said that, according to Diana, on the eve of the wedding, Charles told her that she did not like her: “I think he didn’t want to lie to his bride. He wanted her to be disabilities from the very beginning, and it was completely killed.” Since at the same conversation, Penny did not have a recorder in his hands, the truth is still slipping away from us.

In addition, a simple logic dictates that even if the princess said something like that, it was not at all the fact that it was true for the truth. At first glance, everything looks like they were quite satisfied with the former press secretary of the Queen Dicca Arbiter in an interview with the Internet channel True Royalty TV, at least at the first time after the wedding.

"They just could not resist, so as not to touch each other."Charles all the time strove to stroke her, and once even slightly poured her. "The referee expressed his opinion after the release of the 4th season of the series" Crown ", in which the main plot line was the relationship between Charles and Diana. The author of the photo, Anwar Hussein signature for the photo, another comparison.

The first and second wife of Prince Charles, Diana and Camilla during visits to the Vatican, which were 24 years old. True, Camille on this photo collage is much more than Diana than Diana, but even when she was much younger, many leisure observers all the time wondered: how could he exchange the beauty Diana for far from a beautiful Camilla, probably the most memorable moment in an interview, which Diana gave Martina Bashira, was her famous phrase: “There were three of us in this marriage, so he was several crowded ".

This was the answer to the question of what role of Charles’s attitude to Camille played that her marriage had broken up. But, according to Elinor Herman, the author of the book about the mistresses of the monarchs "Sex with the kings", the relationship of crowned men with strangers did not always mean active sexual life: "Diana was beautiful, but emotionally unstable," she said to the BBC.

This was the difference. " The author of the photo, Chris Jackson signature for the photo, who knows how royal history would have developed if Prince Charles could marry a woman who he loved his whole life, but do not forget that Diana herself had many novels on the side. And which of the spouses began to physically change the first, we will never know.

Diana was not a victim of the media of the tabloid and not a photo of the photo, Tim Graham Photo Library Signature to the photo, Diana knew how to pose to photographers starting from the year when she became the bride of Prince Charles and until her death in the year, Diana’s relationship with the press were, let’s say, not quite simple. Like any person, she liked it when they talked about her well, and she could not stand criticism, complained that journalists and photographers literally hunt for her, but did not disdain the media to manipulate public opinion in her favor.

As the British PR consultant Richard Fitzuyillams said, "the relationship between Diana and the press were fateful symbiotic." In the year, when the royal marriage was already cracking at the seams, the whole world spread out a photograph in which the “lonely and abandoned” Diana with a bitter smile on a beautiful face sat against the background of the most famous monument of conjugal love - the Taj Mahal mausoleum.

The author of the photo, Anvar Hussein, I have no doubt that this photo is well known to you, it really around the whole world has not been a single tabloid, not a single glossy magazine that would not “catch” the idea of ​​the picture: someone builds an architectural masterpiece for his beloved deceased wife, and someone throws her quite living spouse, forcing her to do her family work alone.

A small amendment: in fact, Diana and Charles were together on this trip ... Diana’s canonization in public opinion began almost the day after her tragic death. But while she was alive, quite a few journalists, commentators and a solid layer of the general public were well aware of the skill with what skill Diana manipulated the press to her immediate benefits.

The author of the photo, Mirrorpix signature for the photo, but the truth is true: the photographers began to hunt for Diana the very day after she became the bride of Prince Charles in general, in certain circles there was a consensus, that in recent years of family life the media became her main weapon in the fight against the wrong husband and his family. She directed the very photo at Taj Mahal.

And this was far from the only episode when Diana used tabloids to embellish her own image due to the image of her husband. Her father, Count Spencer, died in the year. Charles, as expected, was going to go to his funeral. The point is not even that the deceased was the father of his wife, but that he was, so to speak, professional courtiers, occupying the position of a Stalmeister or a stable under George VI, and in the early years of the reign of Elizabeth II, therefore, the royal family was not a stranger.

The author of the photo, Bryn Colton Signature to the photo, photographers at Aberdin Airport in anticipation of the arrival of the plane with Diana and Charles in the year Diana, however, told her husband that she did not want to see him there. Charles’s assistants had to urgently organize a previously canceled meeting so that his absence at the funeral was not perceived as callousness and indifference.

But even the friends of the princess believed that she pursued this goal, although they added that she was not to blame, look, they say, what he brought to her. All this, of course, does not cancel the fact that often the attention of photographers and journalists brought her to tears. Photographers actively chased Diana before and after a divorce.The reason was extremely simple: she, as they say, “sold” newspapers one of the editors of the tabloid newspaper, who wished to remain an unknown case immediately after the funeral of Diana, and the public opinion of wholesale and the retail accused of her death paparazzi, the media and the royal family, said that “her relationship with us was a much less“ love -inanimism ”, and I would have a much larger way - I would divert it from this.

All possible benefits, and if it smells fried, I will do everything to minimize the consequences. " According to this anonymous editor, Diana was an excellent political strategist. It is difficult to assume what the relationship of Diana and the media would be these days. Do not forget that she died before the life of numerous celebrities began to be considered under a microscope in social networks.

She and Dodi al-Faid are barely visible in the rear seats of the car, which in a minute or two will crash into the support of the tunnel under the Alma bridge, but even if we assume that Diana would decide to completely move into the shadows, without provoking an increased interest in her person, it would hardly have happened to her-for one simple reason: the mother of the future king would continue to attracted attention and the public, and the public, and the public, and the public, and the public, and the public, and the public.

From whether she would like it or not.