ASTEMIROV Bagautdin biography


Active participation in the organization of the Dagestan Komsomol. With writing poetic works. Pursuing a policy of studying the Russian language in the schools and technical schools of Dagestan. Work on the unification of the literary forces of the republic. Creating the play "The offensive". The birth of the daughter of Farida. Removing from the post of People's Commissar of Education.

Departure to Moscow. Review from Moscow. Exception from the party. Parish to prison. The charge of participating in the counter-revolutionary bourgeois-nationalist organization, an attempt to establish in Dagestan the bourgeois republic under the protectorate of Turkey, the preparation of terrorist acts and an armed uprising. Single camera. Investigator Konarev.

News of the eviction of the family from home. The passage of a medical examination that confirmed the facts of beating. The end of the investigation. The verdict of the military tribunal: 20 years old. Filing a cassation appeal. Return to Dagestan. B.'s complaint without absolutely no crime before the owls. I was arrested on April 30. Subsequently, the same exposed enemy Lomonosov categorically demanded that I testify as a member of the Burnak.

There was also no question of all this, even with my exclusion from the ranks of the party in November in the city of the military unit, Fomin completely distorted this fact, writing down in the court verdict that I was excluded from the party in connection with this case in detail, see absolutely no evidence of exposing me of involvement in this ton. Making sure of my stubborn refusal to fulfill their requirements, on February 8, I followed the same exactly the same.

The hut of Lomonosov also obtained from other “participants” by the “consequences” of the testimony for me, necessary for the design of me as a participant in the organization of the Burnards. I, like all the others, could not stand the horrors of all these endless torture and pushed himself on to myself and others. I have verbally and in writing in writing on January 5th, however, regardless of all these commissions, acts of medical examination, confrontation and a number of my subsequent refusals from the testimony from under the stick written according to the notes of Koyaforin and Konarev, the latter turned out to be omnipotent, the same methods made the commission abandoned their statements and completed the vile enemy thought of Lomonosov - To defeat the best young personnel of the Lenin -Stalin party: in this way, the “business” artificially built on me and took shape as the material of the preliminary investigation, which served as my condemnation.

At the same time, the court rejected my legal petitions without any reason: and the court did not even allow the prosecution put up in the indictment to the court to confirm the “own” testimonies under the pressure of the employees of the NKVD of the DASSR in court to the court of the “recruiter” of Korkmasov D. Korkmasov. Sivui “witnesses”, who did not pass by the materials of the preliminary investigation, or on the indictment and on their joint work with me in the NKPROS, which were obliged to bear the corresponding responsibility for the wrecking, if they actually took place, B.

Gazhdiev, according to the same Sivudi, was allowed the accusations of Panaev and Bagaev as witnesses Amirkhan, persons of fartial and had nothing to do with my work, who did not know her and did not show anything on the preliminary investigation. All this, being a gross violation of the procedural norms of conducting legal proceedings, was allowed solely because the court had nothing to base its decision in relation to me, because the entire “material” of the preliminary investigation was dropped by all participants in the process, and the facts - documents were easily refuted, and the failure was undoubted, t.

The only argument of the prosecution on which Fomin substantiated the presence of Burnaks. I categorically stated my involvement in this bourgeois-nationalist leadership, I also tell you that I was literally in the pen of this leadership in the person of Samursky, which soon after my return to the [Agnes] n literally began a campaign against me. In connection with the arrival in Granovsky, M.

Samursky began to lead the struggle against the party leadership, and we managed to expose it, as a result of which he was not filmed in the [ASTRT]. Subsequently in the year, I, being the head. He could not forget all this and, apparently, was waiting for a convenient moment for reckoning, which he carried out after his return to Dagestan as the secretary of the regional committee. He began by getting my withdrawal from the regional committee bureau under the pretext of reducing the composition of the bureau and withdrawing me at the beginning of the year from the post of NKPRO-C.

Without calming in this, in connection with my departure to Moscow to study, taking advantage of the exchange of the party documents that I took place in Moscow, he directed all sorts of slander after me to prevent the exchange of my desk. This fact lies in the fact that, as a summer young man, since December, I spoke about this fact on all cleaning, as during the desk of the desk.Moscow, where I went through an exchange and where I gave a detailed explanation to all these swinks and set out in detail my service in the above team.

The bureau of the district committee did not find this with a motive, casting in any stepmother to doubt my devotion of the Lenin-Stalin party, and gave me a new party party. Seeing the inability to stain me in an objective organization, he achieved my review from his studies in September in the same leadership of Samursky and Lomonosov I was arrested.

Instead of analyzing all these facts, Fomin attributed me to this leadership and made the conclusions that arise from here on other accusations. The second argument of the court was the decision of the United Plenum of the Dagobkom and the DKK from G. Of course, while also politically and technically illiterate, I could not figure out the editorial office of this decision and signed it as a Plenum as a secretary of the R-Commercial Code of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks and as a decision made by the Plenum and could not consider it as a counter-revolutionary document and, especially as some kind The platform of the counter -revolutionary organization of the Burnaks, as qualified after 15 years by a preliminary investigation and in the court of Fomin.

Of course, in one thing that I signed in the city more competent and not only signing it, but probably editing him to the regional committee bureau as a member of the Bureau Side Gabiev, who was judged with me, was justified by the same court of Fomin. Also released by him and the investigation that signed this decision by the Ataev D. did not put up any other documents against me, as well as living witnesses, and could not, because they were not at all.

On the contrary, all the witnesses of the “accusations”, both by one process with me and others, completely abandoned “their” testimonies to me as a joint participant in the organization. Moreover, a number of these “witnesses”, “participants” by the organization of D. Suleimanov, 3. Feo-Daev, A. Huseynov and others. Ibrahimov, G. Zamkhanov, Sungurov S. Saud-Guseyov, etc.

There is nothing to say about the incriminating of the charges under Art. The accusation of the wrecking of Art. I excited the petition to the court to draw up a competent examination on this issue or to make a number of documents and certificates from the NKPROS of the DASSR and the call of living witnesses from the NKPROS, but I was refused without any motivation. Meleshchuk, and the answer of the instructor of Temir-Khanov Mirza would confirm that only from the moment I came to work in the NKPROS, it was the actual introduction of Russian and native languages ​​in schools and pedagogical studies.

ASTEMIROV Bagautdin biography

Meanwhile, the court, under the chairmanship of Fomin, completely ignored this actual data, did not attract them to the analysis, despite my urgent petitions. The court completely accused me of introducing the Turkic language in schools, while in no Nyurk school the Turkic language was taught under my leadership. All this is easy to install documentary at any time. I was also indistently and unfounded of clogging the composition of teachers with alien elements, not indicating a single alien I adopted.

If even this took place, then this could happen exclusively through the fault of local district executive committees, which, before the decision of the Central Committee and the Council of People's Commissars in the city, on the contrary, after this decision, according to which the regulation of the composition of the teacher was represented by a NKPROS, I, in the order of individual verification of teachers, excluded from their composition alien elements adopted without me cm.

I accused me of ignoring the popularization of the leaders of the leaders of the Proletarian Revolution of Lenin, Stalin is also unfounded, because all the textbooks approved by me were compiled in full accordance with the programs of the NKPROS of the RSFSR, obviously approved by the Central Committee of the All -Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, and according to the exact profile of Russian stable textbooks, also obviously viewed by the Central Committee and approved by the latter.

Any examination could very easily establish this irrefutable fact. If even such an ignoring took place, then first of all, it should be held accountable to the authors of these textbooks themselves, while all of them to this day work on textbooks, not only did I not ignore the popularization of the leaders of the Proletarian Revolution of Lenin, Stalin, but, on the contrary, dedicated their best poetic works to them.

In short, the successes of cultural construction, achieved precisely with my leadership in - gg. Culture has grown immeasurably. At the stand, accurate data are given about all this. Visitors will see how the number of schools, technical schools, universities and hospitals is growing from year to year. ” I could not be in my social origin. Thanks to them, I also became in the honorary ranks of Soviet writers and began to be printed in my native language and in translations in the Out language.

To thicken the colors, the chairman of the court Fomin writes to me in the verdict that I served in the White Army and was a false -partisan. I categorically stated in court, I declare to you that I never served in the White Army.Even before the Councils of the Councils in the D [ASTA], I did not serve the summer young man in the training team of the Mountain Government with an rank and file for 3 months, December, on the contrary, at the time of the frantic revelry of the White Army in D [Agnes], I did not fight against it in the ranks of the Kumyk-Chechen revolutionary detachment as an assistant to the beginning of the staff of this detachment.

Dag. The NKVD and after its defeat worked white underground. In confirmation of these facts, I urged the court to call the living participants of this detachment, which I was also denied. For the same purpose, thicken the colors Fomin lubricates a very important, significant fact of removing me back in February G. instead of the objective disclosure of the true background of the above bullying, I need to persecute the bourgeois-nationalist leadership of Dags.

Confirmation of this stamping is at least the fact that the military. In view of the foregoing, I strongly ask you to protest the top before the presidium. I can’t admit in my thoughts, so that I, who gave all my conscious life to the great work of the Lenin -Stalin party, entering its ranks in the city