Phantikov George biography

With potassium orotate! Although he managed to make it epic to some relatively correct conclusions.

I will not experience your patience and list all sorts of macroborters and other synthesis gurus. As you know, in science there are two ways to solve the problem - the analysis method and the synthesis method. All modern theories of bodybuilding and powerlifting are based on the synthesis method - analysis of empirical studies, in other words, a generalization of diary entries of leading athletes and sometimes just blind copying ...

I do not claim the role of a leading theorist or super -trainer, but it was always important for me to understand the meaning of every kilogram I raised. My life is short, so I could not afford to study the records of my training - this path is too long and is unlikely to lead to success. Of course, I began to study the anatomy and biochemistry of man. At some point, it even seemed to me that I was close to unraveling.

But alas, apparently, my knowledge was not deep enough at that time, and some were completely false. On the Web, some of my articles have become quite widespread. However, I dare to upset you those who applied my recommendations on myself - I relied on incorrect generally recognized statements. Well, more about that later .. more or less intelligible thoughts I met in the conceptual book of Frederick Hatfield, he was also a doctor of Square and for a long time built conclusions based on his postulates, which, as it turned out, were false.

And not so long ago, a discussion took place on the Internet forum on the Gym Online site, its topic was the same muscle theory. What arguments did not give opponents: - One defended the theory of refusal training from the point of view of philosophy and evolution - the muscles of the predator were given as an example ... But you must admit, relying on such a weak argument, stupid to build a whole system - another, pitching and doctor, The arguments brought quite significant arguments - since the muscle tissue receives all the main damage during the negative phase and there are so -called satellites cells that can form new fibers, then the weight does not need to be lifted at all - it is necessary to lower it and tear the muscle to such and such a mother or perform forced refusal repetitions, which also leads to microwaves in his idea!

A new fiber is born through microwaves - hyperplasia .. A very seductive theory. But as it turned out, microwave receives mainly myofibril, not fiber. But all these were just hypotheses .. As I said earlier, I wrote a number of articles and how it was not regrettable to recognize today they initially rely on false statements .. generally accepted statements that received their widespread through Western bodybuildings ..

In their surveys, I got to the problem laboratory of the Russian State Academy of Physical Culture, I was somewhat detected by me Biochemist and physiologist Viktor Nikolayevich Seluyanov. One of the largest scientists has long been dealing with power training and powerlifting in particular. With this introduction, I will begin the narrative of how, after all, it is necessary to train correctly based on knowledge of the causes of hypertrophy.

I repeat - the theory is based on the analytical method. Most of you will be shocked, I am going to reject many universally recognized postulates and, of course, justify this. So, the myth is the first .. In modern biochemistry, it has recently been really customary to divide fibers into fast and slow - each fiber is inert with a certain number of nerve impulses.

The more nerve impulses, the higher the activity of the atpase, the faster the fiber is reduced. As for the color. Mioglobin in the muscle cell performs the same functions that hemoglobin performs in blood plasma - tolerates oxygen. In no case on the activity of ATFAZ, the fibers are divided into oxidative and glycolytic. So far, biochemists have not found red fibers rich in myoglobin, which would have high activity of atfase.

Therefore, the division into red-honey and white-beast is very conditional. So, myth is second .. It is generally accepted that slow muscle fibers have less growth potential than rapid muscle fibers, this generally accepted statement has no reason - it is false! Almost all biopsy tests showed that fast fibers are much superior to slow fibers in development.

The conclusion is quite logical - the growth potential is much larger than that of the slow. However, it was not taken into account that the athletes-donors were representatives of high-speed sport of sprints, the bar, etc. In the middle of the General century, the favorite technique of bodybuilders was a pumping-the content of the muscles was considered a necessary and sufficient condition for hypertrophy.The initial ideology of pumping is absurd, however, the bodybuilders at step by step felt for the path to hypertrophy of slow fibers - a large number of repetitions leads to acidification and refusal - it is this condition that corresponds to the optimal concentration of hydrogen ions in detail later, in combination with volumetric training from 4 to 12 approaches for each group of muscles, this gave the result.

Samples of muscle tissue of professional bodybuilders proves that red fibers reach absolutely the same size in diameter as fast. Slow muscle fibers grow no worse than fast. It is only necessary to train them correctly, but this is later, so, the third myth is believed that fast fibers develop an effort much larger than slow. In other words, fast stronger than slow. This is an "axiomatic" statement false.

A small anatomical excursion .. the higher the pulsation frequency means the number of nerve impulses that the brain sends to the muscles, the more energy consumes a muscle per unit time. The faster the fiber, the more pulsations and higher the activity of ATFAZ, the more ATP molecules he needs per unit time. Therefore, as a rule, fast fibers I prefer to “tear out” glucose than oxidize fatty acids in mitochondria.

Moreover, the activity of atphase is not discrete - modern methods of biochemistry so far make it possible to distinguish only two states. That is why biochemists so far clearly divide the fibers by only two types in speed. The brain sends from 5 to pulses - a small amount of impulses inerts slow fibers, a large number of pulses inerts fast. What are the arguments in defense of the “forces” of fast fibers were not given: and the frequency of twitching you now know that the speed depends only on the activity of the atphase enzyme and some of the myofibrils structure, some believe that myosine of fast fibers differs from the slow -mosen with a large amount of bridge compounds - although in fact the difference is the most advanced atphase, they consider the most advanced ones, refer The asynchronism of the attachment of the globular heads of Miozin to the actin, that fast fibers develop a greater effort, since due to the high activity of the atphase enzyme per unit time of the time of bridge joints is greater.

This is fair - but only for a unit of time, that is, if you give time with slow fibers, then they will develop the same effort. Therefore, it suggests itself that they are strong - stronger than slow. And the biopsy almost always "performed" on the side of fast fibers - their diameter was usually larger. And since thicker, it is stronger. But the slow can be as thick as fast, and therefore power can develop no less!

Slow are able to develop the same effort as fast fibers, all other things being equal - the thickness of the fiber, etc. Slow grow as “easy” as fast - you only need to develop them correctly! The reasons for the growth of what has changed in comparison with generally accepted postulates who have developed in the "people", thanks to a massive attack on the brains of iron lovers of pro -Western media!

But what: slow fibers are no weaker than fast! Slow fibers have no less potential of hypertrophy than fast fibers. Reds do not mean slow, but white - does not mean fast. That is, it is not a direct dependence between the amount of myoglobin the color of the muscles in the muscles and the activity of the atphase the speed of muscle contraction. Many on the network rolled their eyes in horror and lamented - “What to do!?

The foundations are crumbling !! Your humble servant was sinful - I was mistaken about slow fibers. So, having destroyed the deadlines, we finally got up to the main factors of muscle growth. I always thought that having understood the level of biochemistry in the causal relationship of the growth of new myofibrils, it was possible to create a universal training training But it was not so easy to do - biochemistry is such a science where almost every chapter of the biochemistry textbook ends with words - this process is not yet studied, and perhaps this is how many have tried to explain the factors that ensure the hypertrophy of the muscles of the most fashionable and the most common time.

surfaces - since the muscles are torn, then it will be restored, but regenerates with excess! Hence the growth! Then, a theory of refusal appeared - some, relying on the laws of evolution and philosophy, began to believe that only the exhaustion of ATP leads to hypertrophy. It is not strange, the final conclusion turned out to be correct - it was the refusal!

But the refusal does not occur when the ATP is depleted, but when the reserves of the creatine phosphate end! This condition corresponds to the optimal concentration of hydrogen ions - the DNA molecule spiral is untied and the necessary sites become available to the action of hormones repetition - the mother of the teaching!Factors that provide the necessary and sufficient conditions for muscle fiber hypertrophy.

In order for the formation of new myofibrils in the muscle fiber to begin the presence of a cell in the muscle fiber: amino acid amino acids are plastic material for building new tissues of hormones testosterone and self -thorotropins of hormones directly affect the DNA of creative phosphate speaking in simple language - gives energy for the DNA about the poultry of the hydraulen Hydrogen ions in a special way affect the protein molecule - the spiral is spilled and the necessary sites of the DNA molecules become available for the action of hormones - the synthesis of matrix proteins begins to begin to grow, it is necessary to start with the building material, that is, amino acids.

This means that for effective anabolism, it is necessary to constantly maintain a high level of amino acids in the blood. In order for the muscle to begin to grow, the energy of the DNA molecule is also necessary, free creativefata is also necessary. Many mistakenly believe that the whole charm of creatine phosphate is that it increases strength endurance. This is not the main reason that creatine should be taken - it must be taken in order to grow your muscles, it is necessary to supply the DNA molecule with energy.

In the light of the above, the effectiveness of the bunch of "creatine-amino acids" increases repeatedly. Immediately after training, it makes sense to take amino acids and peptides and creatine together. It is reliably known that severe training stimulates the secretion of testosterone and somatotropin. The question arises - how hard it should be. If you follow the path of a natural athlete and completely denied yourself “pleasure” to feel under the tongue of a bitter -sweet taste of metandrostenolone, then you should train extremely difficult - the volume of work should be extremely large ..

The following fact can serve as an indicator of the correctness of your training - at the end of the training the libido increases significantly! Many, relying on the theory of Mentzer, preach the principle of one or two of the refusal approaches. This path is possible only for "chemists". Metandrostenolone by any ace can compensate for flaws in the method! The minimum number of approaches in order to start hypertrophy should be at least 4!

However, heavy volumetric workouts for a long time inevitably lead to stagnation and overtraining.