Biography of Yana Romanov

The press service of the SBR talked with Yana Romanova-in the recent past, the biathlete of the Russian national team, and now a candidate of pedagogical sciences, a teacher and co-author of several methodological guidelines for the training of biathletes. We publish the first part of the interview. What moved you? She began with rifle training - conducted various self -studies, talked with successful athletes on issues of interest to me.

The material was accumulated and, in the end, they told me that I, in fact, have a ready -made candidate dissertation. At first I did not have an understanding of the structure of this work, how it should be designed, there was simply the accumulated material that was helped to systematize. In the year I graduated from graduate school approx. Omsk, but only after the Olympics in Sochi, when I spoke for the last year, sitting at the training camp, I decided that the work was done large and I want to complete it with a dissertation.

After my career was completed, I took up the processing of the results, and defended myself in the year. I immediately received an offer to work at our university. Still, I stayed half-time as a teacher, and began to work with Reutskaya at the Scientific Research Institute approx. For a long time I had these doubts, fluctuations, for me it was more a hobby. It’s not that I didn’t take it seriously, I simply did not think that it would become a profession.

But in recent years, I realized that I like it, and I can do this. How many go to graduate school? And when I finished in the year, I realized that I wanted to continue to study, and I went to graduate school. It is necessary to increase the level of theoretical preparedness of our athletes. This will improve the quality of the training process. Now everything is slightly slowed down due to the fact that I spend a lot of time with children.

I have a rather critical attitude towards myself. In sports, I always put serious landmarks for myself. In the Russian national team there were very strong athletes near me, and I was guided by them. There was an understanding that if I do not reach their level, then I do not work well. So here - there are people who are a guideline for me in science. And I understand that I am still very far from them.

And I understand that in order to move on in science and really achieve something worthwhile, you need to invest and surrender to this in its entirety. I would like to move in science at a faster pace, but so far not everything turns out. At least three manuals - in shooting, preparing the reserve and various types of testing athletes - went to the GG. When the SBR set the task as specifically as possible, briefly and accessible to prepare several methodological manuals for the publication, I gladly took up this work.

They are designed for novice coaches who need basics. And at the Research Institute we conduct research, go to various tests with biathlonists. True, in recent years I have not gone anywhere for family reasons, I only process and describe the material that my young colleagues gathered. We are preparing reports on research work-this is now my main job. You can probably now give any lessons to the time management?

Have you thought about it? There is no time to give lessons. There are coaches who are older than you by age. How do they perceive information from younger specialists? Here all the lecturers, including me, come up with their own developments, no one performs with the message "We must do it only." I have normal contact with the coaches, after all, since childhood in the biathlon. The coach in the region is ten in one: he is a coach, a doctor, a researcher, an administrator, and a service.

I understand perfectly well that when we talk about scientific achievements, usually this is some kind of narrow study that we try to introduce into the process, and the coach should cover everything and he has his own idea of ​​the process. Therefore, I try to build all my reports so that they have no feeling that I was teaching them something. Therefore, Sergey and I show how to use the Skatt simulator with both young athletes and more prepared.

This simulator has its own specifics, it has long been used in prefabricated teams, but in the regions it has not been implemented everywhere, and in my part of the report I want to show how it can be used in working with novice biathletes. Is this somehow reflected in their activity? Are there those who arrived for a checkmark and sleeping on the back desk?

Still, having worked with students, I had seen enough of how people fall asleep with boredom. But the coaches work here all day with interest: the lecturers are selected thoroughly, everything is very accessible to build their reports, and there is no boring monotonous material. An almost perfect program is proposed here. For several years of such work, the SBR will increase the effectiveness of biathlonists in the regions.